Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 3,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
[C.] [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:06 pm
(c) Bruce borrowed a copied CD from a friendNo. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Capulong, Michael J. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
Smits, Maastricht University, The Netherlands and University of Helsinki, Finland.K48 .E42 2012 Comparative LawExclusionary rules in comparative law / Stephen C. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
After an detailed discussion of the matter Justice Slade DBE held that that German law applied because England was not the common habitual residence of the parties at the time of the accident. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 8:29 am
G.S. 14-51.2(b). [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:21 am
Hickey, Roger C. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
Challenging Prop.22 in court This has not been the end of the matter. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:12 pm
The holding period is key – and that’s where the ex-dividend matters. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
-Adrian J. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 1:44 pm
The county court trial divisions presiding over misdemeanor DUI and DWAI cases are as follows: Division C, Judge Burback; Division E, Judge Carpenter; Division B, Judge Fisch; Division F, Judge Moore; Division G, Judge Randall; Division D, Judge Sargent; Division A, Judge Stuart; Division H, Judge Vance; Division J, Judge Woodford. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:53 am
In particular, they argued that (a) prior notification was inconsistent with their right to freedom of expression under Article 10; (b) the State should be afforded a wide margin of appreciation; and (c) prior notification did not reflect continental legal practices or the practicalities of journalism. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 1:44 pm
The county court trial divisions presiding over misdemeanor DUI and DWAI cases are as follows: Division C, Judge Burback; Division E, Judge Carpenter; Division B, Judge Fisch; Division F, Judge Moore; Division G, Judge Randall; Division D, Judge Sargent; Division A, Judge Stuart; Division H, Judge Vance; Division J, Judge Woodford. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
It doesn’t matter if the stock went up and down a hundred times in the middle. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 7:46 am
Adrian J. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:21 pm
The authority’s grounds were a) that a strict construction of HA 1996 s.175 meant that it was only obliged to consider whether accommodation was available, not whether it was reasonable. b) if it was obliged to consider reasonableness to occupy, this was only in reference to size and facilities, not location or other factors. c) Even of this was wrong, all relevant factors were in anyhow considered, so not Wednesbury. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 7:25 am
District Court Judge Ernest C. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:33 am
J. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:51 am
Section 1(3) excludes from the ambit of s.1(1) and 1(1A) any course of conduct that: (a) is aimed at preventing or detecting crime; (b) is taken pursuant to any enactment or rule of law; or (c) is ‘reasonable’ in the particular circumstances of the case. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm
WILLIAM J. [read post]
