Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 13,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2018, 10:20 am
Wales LLC, 993 F. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 8:11 am
(b) With respect to the requirement of inventive step, communication B contained on page 1 an introductory remark to the effect that an amendment of the claims based on the description as originally filed in order to arrive at inventive subject-matter seemed impossible. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:19 pm
And for Class B1–E sex crimes committed between December 1, 1996 and December 1, 2011, and Class F–I sex crimes committed on or after December 1, 2011, the extra time included in the maximum sentence (9 months in each case) doesn’t match the length of the supervision period (60 months). [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
Players: Decision by Judge Diarmuid F. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
Reading some of the recent cases involving removal under the Class Action Fairness Act is an excellent reminder that venue really matters, and some lawyers really, really, really don't want to end up in federal court. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:47 am
Christie, 570 F. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:32 am
Vinson, 805 F.3d 120 (4th Cir. 2015). [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:32 am
Vinson, 805 F.3d 120 (4th Cir. 2015). [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:01 am
I also think she doesn't have that kind of magic. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:35 pm
Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (1989). [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:53 am
Castillo, __ F.3d. __, 2007 WL 2120232 (9th Cir. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 5:23 am
F. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:23 am
It doesn't matter, just let the poor guy alone. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Conservative spokesman William F. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
But that doesn’t mean that there are written opinions elaborating such matters. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
”But in the case of the military policy that preceded “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” it appeared that status was as important as conduct. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
The use of a machine doesn't save it, since it is merely incidental. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:11 am
Matrixx Initiatives, 585 F.3d 1167 (9th Cir. 2009), issued a really troubling decision, holding that reports of adverse product events - although not even the plaintiff claimed that they were statistically significant - were enough to get past a motion to dismiss in a securities action alleging that these reports should have been disclosed to investors.We didn't blog about it at the time because it wasn't a drug or device (Matrixx makes Zicam, which is… [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 11:03 am
By George F. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:00 pm
But in the event that it was about entrapment, I took a quick look at some cases, and I didn't see anything to indicate that entrapment can be litigated as a pre-trial matter through a motion to suppress. [read post]
