Search for: "Opinion Guest" Results 1481 - 1500 of 4,910
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I wielcome the opportunity to publish guest posts written by responsible commentators on topics of interest to this blog's readers. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm by Derek Bambauer
(Guest post by Jane Yakowitz, Visiting Assistant Professor at Brooklyn Law School. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:03 pm by Kristen Osenga
I am happy that Dan and PrawfsBlawg are letting me guest here this month. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 11:38 am by Eleonora Rosati
Holding otherwise, as the GC does, represents, in the opinion of this author, a (disruptive) escamotage in order to have the Contested Design (and, therefore features of appearance that are solely dictated by their technical function) benefit from the exception set out under Art. 8(3).In other words, in the GC’s construction, the concocted concurrent application of both Arts. 8(1) and 8(2) serves the purpose, in the view of this author, to use Art. 8(2) as a “trojan horse”… [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 9:20 am by Sophie Corke
This Kat likes the flowers (and maybe even the bumblebees)If you didn't get the chance to keep up with The IPKat last week, never fear: this week's roundup is here.CopyrightThe big copyright news last week came in the form of Advocate General Øe's Opinion in Joined Cases C-682/18 and C-683/18, advising the CJEU to rule that platforms are not liable for the making available of infringing user-uploaded content under EU law prior to the DSM Directive. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
 Only after completing the narrative can you then buttress your claim with supporting legal and technical opinions. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
McElveen, of Jones Day, wrote the following guest post, for which we thank him. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:16 am
Today’s post is courtesy of guest author, Sheryl Schuff. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Amanda Rice
Brooks Holland, guest blogging for SCOTUSblog, also discusses the Tinklenberg argument. [read post]