Search for: "POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1" Results 1481 - 1500 of 1,577
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Whatever the case, the number of officers is but one consideration among many, and it certainly does not on its face render the search unreasonable. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World… [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:51 am
It's at abyss2hope and this is the legal section:In One Person's Word posted at PC Bloggs - a Twenty-first Century Police Officer, we get a discussion of the low UK rape conviction rates and a list of some of the flimsy reasons why crown prosecutors decided not to prosecute a particular case. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 12:07 am
Williams, OATH Index No. 1968/08 (May 30, 2008).Administrative law judge John Spooner found that a special officer wrongfully displayed her badge in three off-duty incidents: once during a dispute with a laundromat attendant, and twice in discussion with a police sergeant, whom she asked to void a parking ticket because she is an officer. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 12:02 am
., 296 A.D.2d 411 Town of Clarkstown police officer John Lynn challenged his termination from employ ­ment while on workers' compensation leave pursuant to Section 71 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Police officers were recruited to participate in the study from agencies that supported the research efforts. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 11:56 am
The Court, less than two weeks after Medtronic, which had been 7 ½ to 1 ½ in favor of preemption, was now 4 to 4 on preemption in the absence of Roberts. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Roosevelt UFSD; grants Chapter Signed Date Effective Date9  01/28/2008      01/28/2008Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.910 S6773 ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits Chapter Signed… [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
While Officer Kipper was completing these tasks, Officer Taylor arrived on the scene with his police dog. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Stephens County, No. 07-10729 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action for allegedly causing or failing to prevent the jailhouse death of plaintiff's son, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) denial of leave to amend the complaint to name five of the "John Doe" defendants was proper since the statute of limitations rendered amendment futile; and 2) there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that sheriff personally caused the… [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Stephens County, No. 07-10729 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action for allegedly causing or failing to prevent the jailhouse death of plaintiff's son, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) denial of leave to amend the complaint to name five of the "John Doe" defendants was proper since the statute of limitations rendered amendment futile; and 2) there was insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude that sheriff personally caused the… [read post]
18 May 2008, 3:47 am
The main suspects in the federal police chief's murder are other federal police officers with ties to the Sinaloa cartel. [read post]
12 May 2008, 9:45 pm
He said he registered his new address with authorities because he does not want to go back to prison. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm by administrator
[viii] When somebody does decide to sue the police for using excessive force, the first problem to overcome is the vague notion of how much police can do to physically restrain a suspect. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:46 am
Because it is a content-neutral statute that focuses on forbidden effects without referring to expression at all, a conviction based on a violation of ORS 166.025(1)(b) does not violate Article I, section 8, unless it is unconstitutionally applied. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 10:17 am
John DonohueIn my view, Justice Scalia blundered badly last week in his concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]