Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 1481 - 1500 of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2016, 10:26 pm by Robert Chesney
  The first one used a FAQ format to provide an outline of (and context for) the key points in Apple’s brief last week in the San Bernadino iPhone case. [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:26 am
 And the SEC took us up on that offer in the  recent AFSCME v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  So far, the federal government has unsuccessfully fought RFRA’s application to the use of illegal drugs in Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 4:21 am by Chijioke Okorie
Furthermore, it is crucial that subscribers are clearly informed about what data is collected, how it is used, and with whom it is shared. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm
Unified knew or should have known that this guy was someone who might well molest someone.The standard instruction in these types of cases is CACI 426. [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:26 am by Benjamin Goh
Given the context of the other provisions of the Enforcement Directive using this standard of proof, the CJEU adopted this standard as well for an Article 8 request for information.Next, the CJEU considered the objectives of the Enforcement Directive to determine the scope of its applicability, especially Article 8. [read post]