Search for: "Park v. Powers"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am
Or, more accurately, yes, we could, but not after People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
This was not a case like Parks because there was “no doubt” that the title was artistically relevant to the content. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 1:46 pm
These neighbors were not happy with the noise and congested parking that accompanied the Petersons’ daughter’s wedding and vociferously complained. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm
In the 1987 case of South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 1:46 pm
These neighbors were not happy with the noise and congested parking that accompanied the Petersons’ daughter’s wedding and vociferously complained. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
Surveillance The RPC blog has examined the Investigatory Powers Bill after it was given royal assent by the Queen. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Perry Homes v Cull. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
Local taxes pay for local expenditures, a powerful self-regulating feature of our three levels of government. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am
The Bill creates an infrastructure of Ministerial powers that ensures voluntary data sharing to the public sector has a lawful basis; that such data sharing is not incompatible with the purpose of obtaining, and that such data sharing is, in practice, exempt from the right to object. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
(Mrs Laura McQueen v Daily Record, Clause 5, 24/05/2012). [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am
Surveillance In response to a 2015 Press Gazette investigation into police use of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA) to secretly view journalists’ call records and identify lawful confidential sources, the UK Government has admitted that its pre-2016 surveillance regime violated human rights laws. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:31 pm
., v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:47 am
” In general, a contract of adhesion is a printed contract—often in small font—prepared by one party with superior bargaining power presented to the other party in a “take-it-or-leave-it” manner. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:31 am
New Jersey: Robertson v Hyde Park Mall There’s much similarity between Congel and the New Jersey Appellate Division’s decision last May in Robertson v Hyde Park Mall: Both involve general partnerships that own and operate shopping malls located in New York.Both partnerships had written agreements with provisions addressing the partnership’s duration keyed to contingent future events that might never occur.Both agreements also broadly… [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
There is no evidence as yet that the Roberts Court is as willing to challenge federal power as the Court was under Burger (National League of Cities v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:19 pm
Next Tuesday, December 8, the Court will take up the case of Evenwel v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
Congress the power to legislate commerce. [read post]
