Search for: "People v Justice A." Results 1481 - 1500 of 22,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 1:57 pm by Paul Ohm
E.g., Smith, 442 U.S., at 742; United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:14 pm by Leslie Pardo
One of the other Supreme Court clerks with whom she served, Deborah Jones Merritt, reflected in the Arizona State Law Journal that Justice McGregor worked on the influential case Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:08 am by ernst
As a justice, he hired the first African American law clerk and helped the Court achieve unanimity in outlawing racially segregated schools in Brown v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 7:02 am by stu@crimapp.com
In People v Smith, Supreme Court No. 140371, the Court limited its 2009 ruling People v McGraw, 484 Mich 120, 124; 771 NW2d 655 (2009), concerning the scoring of sentencing guideline variables under the Michigan Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:22 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
If Ted Cruz or Josh Hawley run instead, people will also challenge their eligibility under Section Three. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:41 am
 Justice Richman joined the Court of Appeal over eight years ago, but the first time he used that phrase was two years ago -- in two different opinions -- and then used it again last year and, thus far, has used it again in two different opinions in 2014.The latest people to nonpluss Justice Richman are insurance adjuster Craig Hansen and his attorneys at Horvitz & Levy ("Appeals Are What We Do") and Weston & McElvain ("Building a Reputation"). [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
As to the first, no privilege arose on the facts; and, even if one did, the interests of justice required that it be precluded (Smurfit Paribas Bank Ltd v AAB Export Finance Ltd [1990] 1 IR 469 (SC); Murphy v Kirwan [1993] 3 IR 501 (SC); Miley v Flood [2001] 1 ILRM 489, [2001] 2 IR 50, [2001] IEHC 9 (24 January 2001); Fyffes v DCC [2005] 1 IR 59 (SC), [2005] IESC 3 (27 January 2005) applied). [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am by Donald Thompson
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:46 pm
"  But, nope, the justices conclude that the various photographs were relevant, admissible, and non-prejudicial (or at least that their probative value outweighed any prejudice). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
 Strongly.)Here's how Justice Whillhite introduces the opinion:"In an unprovoked, premeditated attack, appellant Jose Abundio stabbed marijuana dealer Timothy Wong to death in order to rob him of marijuana appellant could not afford to buy. [read post]