Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 11:27 am
News people would issue “revised” rankings to knock Duke out of the top tier. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 6:00 pm
Hamptons International Dubai LLC & anr v Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors heard 23 July 2010 (Eady J) Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson) BBC v HarperCollins, heard 31 August and 1 September 2010 (Morgan J) [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:35 am
If the tax is not assessable in India, there is no question of TDS being deducted by an assessee;(v) The general principle of fiscal legislation is that given a sufficient territorial connection or nexus between the person sought to be charged and the country seeking to tax him, income tax may extend to that person. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm
The restriction confirmed by the courts in Whaley v Lord Watson 2000 (later confirmed by the House of lords). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 12:54 pm
Jersey Media Group Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
They correctly invoke Hunt v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:34 am
Still, on the brighter side, in only a couple more years I'll be in a different age group, albeit a couple of years nearer to death...The reference to Larkin reminded me of perhaps his best known poem This Be The Verse, famously quoted by Lord Justice Wall in CP v AR & Anor last year. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:19 am
(Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill 2010, A distorted view of the public interest? [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:28 am
But some judgments are genuinely important for many people; for example the recent ruling in Tchenguiz & Ors v Imerman – relating to the use of stolen evidence in court - which could impact anyone involved in divorce proceedings. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Technogenia v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am
Patel, R (on the application of) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin) (27 August 2010) – Read judgment The wife of the purported ringleader of the ’7/7? [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:04 am
Mohammed Dica was refused leave to appeal to the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm
This Kat has been among those who have sided with Lord Justice Jacob in his vitriolic criticism of the reasoning of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure when the case returned from that Court to the referring court for final determination (see IPKat post, "Trade mark ruling muzzles free and honest speech, says Court of Appeal", here). [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
The WSJ Law Blog excerpts this part of the opinion in American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
People, 96 Illinois, 96; People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:44 pm
Porter Magill v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:28 pm
On your own behalf, or on behalf of the Lord. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:09 pm
We consider that the Minister should be required to explain why the costs of resisting further litigation in the case of Kay v United Kingdom on this repeat issue are justified… We are concerned that the issue of respect for people's homes in summary possession cases remains unresolved, despite numerous decisions of the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:09 pm
We consider that the Minister should be required to explain why the costs of resisting further litigation in the case of Kay v United Kingdom on this repeat issue are justified… We are concerned that the issue of respect for people's homes in summary possession cases remains unresolved, despite numerous decisions of the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights. [read post]
