Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 5,472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2017, 3:36 pm
They point out that “[o]ne would not ordinarily say, ‘You better get a search warrant, or else people will get hurt. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:35 am
The Fourth Amendment protections for “persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,” only protects against searches conducted by state actors or someone deputized to act on their behalf. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:32 am
United States 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell-phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell-phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:58 am
One of the individuals who was shot and wounded raised a BB gun and pointed it at officers after they had broken into the shed without a search warrant. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:00 am
There does not appear to be any physical evidence directly attributed to the two main defendants at this time (hence the conspiracy charges), though law enforcement did execute numerous search and seizure warrants and recovered a great deal of contraband. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
`The exclusionaryrule prohibits introduction at trial of evidence obtained as the result of an illegal search or seizure. [read post]
27 May 2017, 11:28 am
One exception to the search warrant requirement is consent: if a person consents to a search and/or seizure, a search warrant is not necessary. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am
United States, 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell-phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell-phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm
United States 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell-phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell-phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
This `reasonable suspicion’ exists `when the officer can point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the search and seizure. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:08 pm
App. 422 (2002) (the independent source exception supported the seizure of the marijuana with a valid search warrant even if it was assumed that the officers had previously made an illegal warrantless entry of the house—no evidence from that entry was used in the search warrant). [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:00 am
Search and seizure, for instance, have different rule sets for different investigation stages. [read post]
22 May 2017, 7:57 am
While a traditional search warrant authorizes law enforcement officials to enter, search and seize property, an SCA warrant, like a subpoena, requires the target of the warrant to compile and turn over its own digital data. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:15 am
Maybe not, says the Fifth Circuit, because the killing of a family pet is a “seizure” of an “effect” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
19 May 2017, 1:49 pm
If the suspect withholds consent to search, the officer still takes the phone, puts it into evidence and seeks a warrant allowing the contents of the phone to be examined. [read post]
19 May 2017, 1:49 pm
If the suspect withholds consent to search, the officer still takes the phone, puts it into evidence and seeks a warrant allowing the contents of the phone to be examined. [read post]
19 May 2017, 1:49 pm
If the suspect withholds consent to search, the officer still takes the phone, puts it into evidence and seeks a warrant allowing the contents of the phone to be examined. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm
United States 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell-phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell-phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
§ 922(g)(1), based on their as-applied Second Amendment claim that their criminal offenses and other particular circumstances do not warrant a firearms disqualification. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm
On appeal, Almonte-Baez claimed that the warrantless search of an apartment violated his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
