Search for: "Seattle v. State"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,702
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services90 7th Street, Suite 4-100San Francisco, CA 94103Voice Phone (415)437-8310FAX (415)437-8329TDD (415)437-8311Region X - Seattle(Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington)Linda Yuu Connor, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:39 am
Johannah also previously interned with the federal government at the State Department in 2018. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm
From Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion yesterday in The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Seattle School District No. 1. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Tausend Professor at Seattle University School of Law. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:32 am
In 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271… [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
Trump celebrated his 365th day as president of the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 10:39 am
., v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Gallo v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Reading that transcript one finds ADLF v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Rand Paul Discloses 16 Months Late That His Wife Bought Stock in Company Behind Covid Treatment Seattle Times – Isaac Stanley-Becker (Washington Post) | Published: 8/11/2021 U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm
In 1936, when a Court majority stretched its judicial muscles in Ashwander v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:35 am
The Supreme Court reached a decision today in Riley v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Global - Patents Global science – threat to local innovation? [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
