Search for: "State of Delaware v. Wells."
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2011, 12:34 pm
In that explanation, the court cited the 1996 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Grimes v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 7:34 am
In that explanation, the court cited the 1996 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Grimes v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:20 am
Scully v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:09 am
Still others, others, like Randall Thomas and Harwell Wells, look to enhanced corporate law oversight, invoking officer fiduciary duties, recently explicated in Gantler v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
(Docket Report) District Court Delaware: Infringement expert must analyze every asserted claim limitation even if opposing discovery responses indicate certain limitations are not disputed: Medtronic Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:05 pm
Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:50 am
Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:06 pm
In most states, a court must consider time, territory, activity limits, impact on the employee, and impact on the public.Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery wrote one of the best, most well-reasoned opinions I have seen on a non-compete case the past several years. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
Key Takeaways The business judgment rule is alive and well in Delaware. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm
So states VC Leo Strine in Fletcher Int'l v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:11 pm
In CDX Liquidating Trust v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:27 am
As stated in Phillips v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 9:46 am
With Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Chris pulls no punches in stating that, while "the issue may be well-settled, it is also well-debated in New York statutory fair value cases because the logic is simply incorrect. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
As stated in Phillips v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:28 am
In Overton v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I hadn’t seen much written about this decision, United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:40 am
In the case of Galaviz v. [read post]
