Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court" Results 1481 - 1500 of 1,678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
So do you agree that marriage is a question reserved for the states to decide based on Baker v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Jun. 9, 2009) In this case, the district court (District of Minnesota) denied Ecolab's motion for JMOL and entered judgment on a jury's verdict that Ecolab infringed FMC's patent. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 10:35 am
07/08/09 press release by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley:BOSTON Today, Attorney General Martha Coakley filed a lawsuit in United States District Court (D. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 12:05 pm
The district court granted summary judgment for the Spaniards on the ground of laches. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
United States Issue: Whether the district court correctly instructed the jury on materiality, whether the district court properly excluded the testimony of a witness under Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:27 am
[Alaska, Indiana, Tennessee, Utah, District of Columbia]Ten states & D.C. have deemed as official one or more of their online primary legal resources. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:02 am
Nelson, a 1972 dismissal of an appeal of a Minnesota supreme court case rejecting a challenge by a same-sex couple to Minnesota's marriage law. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:53 am
Nelson, a 1972 dismissal of an appeal of a Minnesota supreme court case rejecting a challenge by a same-sex couple to Minnesota's marriage law. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:29 pm
The 8th Circuit today reversed two district court decisions and held that medical residents who work more than 40 hours per week at the Mayo Clinic and University of Minnesota are subject to employment taxes. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the District Minnesota under CAFA, and, as you would expect, plaintiffs filed a moved to remand. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:18 pm
  The District Court (Judge Kyle from the District of Minnesota, applying Arkansas law due to a choice of law provision), granted summary judgment to the employee, awarding him $81,051 based on the defendant company’s breach of its monthly payment obligations, as set forth in the non-competition agreement. [read post]