Search for: "State v Sullivan"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,736
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
The Court failed to extend the at-will exemption to Sullivan, stating that regulatory compliance was not at the core of, nor was it the only purpose of, his job. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm
In this Petition for review of two orders of the United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Appeal Court ruled by Summary Order which does not have precedential effect. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
This week at SCOTUS: As discussed last week by Col Sullivan, there is now a third active petition for certiorari by the Supreme Court – Stanley v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:49 am
These allegations are sufficient to state a claim for legal malpractice (see Garnett v Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP, 82 AD3d 435, 435 [2011]; see generally Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d 1082, 1083 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 701 [2005]). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:30 am
Fullmer Legal Aid Attorney of the Year Award – Mary V. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:31 am
Here is the abstract: New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:31 am
Here is the abstract: New York Times v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
From New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
Here is the abstract: New York Times v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:19 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:00 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:00 am
As an initial matter, Sullivan grapples with an important question plaguing the civil rights community and the employment bar: does Swierkiewicz v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
UN member states asked the UK about ‘super-injunctions’, online freedom of expression and the defamation bill: “The UK’s representative at the review, Lord McNally, responded to the questions and recommendations regarding defamation and its impact on freedom of expression by stating that ‘his baby’ aimed to get the balance right between a free media and the right of the individual to privacy, and that it was regarded as a ‘good law’… [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am
courtesy of our readers.Number one:A tip of the cyber-cap to Mike Imbroscio at Covington and Bart Sullivan at Fox Galvin for sending us Aranda v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:41 am
May 24, 2010 – The United States Supreme Court decides Hardt v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:23 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:24 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 10:09 am
United States v. [read post]
