Search for: "State v. Austin" Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 6:26 am by Kiran Bhat
Tuesday’s arguments in the GPS surveillance case United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
Tygart | Austin Federal Court Dismisses Lance Armstrong Lawsuit Against USADA, Disputing, August 20, 2012 Armstrong v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:45 am by Silver Law Group
Investments are made through Cardone Capital’s equity funds, such as Cardone Equity Fund V, LLC (Fund V) and Cardone Equity Fund VI, LLC (Fund VI). [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by Josh Blackman
University of Texas at Austin (affirmative action) Joined amicus brief of blue states in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Marissa Miller
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:31 am
Holder, the plaintiff, a subdivision of Austin, Texas, sued the United States, arguing that Section 5 exceeds the scope of Congress's authority to enforce the 15th Amendment. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Tami Stark and Ladan Stewart, White & Case LLP, on Saturday, July 20, 2024 Tags: ALJs, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Tami Stark and Ladan Stewart, White & Case LLP, on Saturday, July 20, 2024 Tags: ALJs, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (The Justices ruled in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilty District v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:33 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" One case to look for in guidance for part of the answer is found in the case, Gomez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post “Trump Hits the Wall of Courts’ Prior Restraint Precedents”. [read post]