Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 1481 - 1500 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2008, 10:00 pm
For a copy of the Court of Appeals's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am by MBettman
  On August 1, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case Ann Wayt v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Division of Family & Children (NFP) - "Jackie Habagger ("Mother") appeals the trial court's involuntary termination of her parental rights with respect to A.H., a minor child. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
As stated by Justice Cromwell for the Supreme Court, in Kerr v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 5:25 am by Samantha Scheller
Now, New York State's Appellate Division is hearing an appeal about whether Winter must comply with a subpoena to divulge confidential sources from her report. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Ezrasons was an appeal from a transcribed oral decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Robert R. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
” The motion was also supported by an affidavit of R.L., where she identified herself as the babysitter and caretaker of the parties’ children, and stated that she “never engaged in a sexual relationship of any kind or nature with” the husband, and that “[a]ny and all times I have been in the [husband]’s presence have been in a professional working capacity wherein I supervises [sic] the parties’ children. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:52 pm by Rick
  The court of appeal further states that despite the fact that the court gave the mother permission to relocate the child, “the court continued joint custody with a modified co-parenting arrangement. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:18 pm
(March 24, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Four) considered whether the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act of 1965 (SCA) (41 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am by Bernard Bell
  As Justice Scalia observed in Employment Division v. [read post]