Search for: "State v. Deal"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 29,378
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am
Dussolier: how do we deal with two trusted flaggers, one of which is a conservative Catholic group and one a LGBTQ+ rights organization? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:54 pm
The case is Joe Formicola v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:34 pm
Bollinger (2003) and Fisher v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:36 am
" Cummings v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 8:31 am
” Cummings v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
Contra, EEOC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
EU-Member state issues: need to ask new questions—is a regulation v a directive conclusive? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
As stated by Chief Justice Wagner, our courts should provide “good justice for everyone, not perfect justice for a lucky few. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
Knöfel: Discover Something New: Obtaining Evidence in Germany for Use in US Discovery Proceedings The article reviews a decision of the Bavarian Higher Regional Court (101 VA 130/20), dealing with the question whether a letter rogatory for the purpose of obtaining evidence for pre-trial discovery proceedings in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware can be executed in Germany. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
The opposition division, however, decided that example 3 of D1 using ENGAGE® 8400 was a suitable starting point for assessing inventive step, without dealing with that argument (Reasons for the decision, page 9, lines 6-16).In the statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant preemptively dealt with the enablement of the disclosure of example 3 of D1 and submitted that D18 is cross-referenced in the paragraph bridging pages 14 and 15 of D1 as a document describing the preparation of… [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
”And that sealed that deal.# # #DECISIONShalimar Leasing, LP v M. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm
Part 2 (our next article) will focus on DCAA’s audit guidance, audit procedures, and best practices for contractors dealing with DCAA audits. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
” The Gray v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
” The Gray v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
” The Gray v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
As the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) explains in United States v. [read post]
