Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 1,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2011, 6:09 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
On 29 January 2015 the Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick and Tomlinson LJJ and Sir Robin Jacob) heard the appeal in the case of R (Ingenious Media) v HMRC. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Case Number: 15-cv-01573 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Date Filed: September 28, 2015 Date of Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 24, 2015 12/23/2015 3/22/2016 2015-138 SEC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
* Jacobs v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
From State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:05 am
The threshold question in Preston v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm
Surveillance is of critical importance in the investigation of serious and organised crime, in determining the extent and patterns of criminal behaviour, and in the gathering of evidence to construct a case against a suspect; thus it has been described as one of the most important legal weapons deployed by the United States against Mafia groups and families (see Jacobs, Busting the Mob: United States v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:54 am
Ashley: Costco v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Jacob and Brae V. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
The Supreme Court stated in D.C. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
On 30 January 2018 the Court of Appeal gave the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Daman v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:36 am
”Matthews v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:00 pm
President Paul Jacobs, that half of the company’s revenue comes from China, and that they “should make money together. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
" In United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
