Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 19,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
The Board granted the petition of adidas AG for cancellation of two registrations owned by the Christian Faith Fellowship Church for the mark ADD A ZERO, in standard character and design form, for "clothing, namely shirts and caps," finding that the Church had not used the marks in commerce prior to the filing date of the underlying applications. adidas AG v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
A consumer searching for e-cigarettes, when faced with a mark with a reputation for clothing and jewellery, will not make the required link necessary to succeed under Article 8(5) EUTMR because the goods are completely different.The decisionEarlier trade marks with a reputation in a Member State enjoy extended protection in accordance with Article 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
At the time of the bench trial, Via Varejo had pending applications for three Casas Bahia service marks in the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:00 am
District Court for Distict of Maryland denied motion to stay on abstention grounds in favor of a pending state court action in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD, pursuant to Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:03 pm
Garden & Pet Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
BA284590, Mark V. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:15 am
Holder v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:07 am
Found this interesting case while working on a comment for Mark McKenna's forthcoming piece in the Iowa Law Review:Hensley Manufacturing v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm
Tauxe, MDa and Mark J. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 9:46 am
Some analysts have suggested that the Mississippi stay, which marks the third reprieve granted by the Court since September 25, signals a de facto nationwide moratorium [CSM news report] on lethal injections until the Supreme Court reaches a decision in the lethal injection case - Baze v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:07 am
But there is a persuasive Ninth Circuit case, Gardner v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:25 pm
Strangely, the U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:20 am
This from the folks at the University of Iowa: CALL FOR PAPERS: For a proposed symposium to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:06 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:38 am
The U.S. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:14 pm
GRANT V. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 11:11 pm
Zuma has connotations other than as a Japanese restaurant and is current head of state. [read post]
