Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 19,478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2010, 11:07 am
Minsky v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:23 pm
McKee (10th Cir., July 20, 2016) (affirming dismissal of Williams' ss 1983 claims for termination in violation of due process because his complaint failed to state any constitutional violation, and refusal to exercise jurisdiction of Williams' state-law retaliation claim)Discrimination / Retaliation*Hollis v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 6:21 pm
Contents include:LectureSundaresh Menon, A Tale of Two Systems: The Public and Private Faces of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Case CommentsJulien Chaisse, Consutel Group SpA in liquidazione v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria: Umbrella Clauses and Breaches of Contract by Public Entities Gabriel M Lentner & Dayana Zasheva, Bridgestone v Panama: Denial of Justice in a Trade Mark Dispute and the Locus Standi of a Licensee in International… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:31 pm
Tauxe, MDa and Mark J. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:37 pm
In 1995, the opinion in the case Stratton-Oakmont v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 5:14 pm
GRANT V. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:30 pm
When the lawyers left that firm without notifying the Alabama court, the notice of the court's decision against their client ended up in the New York firm's mail room, where it was marked "Return to Sender. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:57 pm
The third trimester, by contrast, marked the point at which a State’s interest in the fetus’s potential of human life becomes compelling, per the Roe Court. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:38 am
The U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
The Board granted the petition of adidas AG for cancellation of two registrations owned by the Christian Faith Fellowship Church for the mark ADD A ZERO, in standard character and design form, for "clothing, namely shirts and caps," finding that the Church had not used the marks in commerce prior to the filing date of the underlying applications. adidas AG v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 1:46 am
[IPKat comment: 2 huge problems with this - (1) all these factors go towards showing that there's a link between the marks, but they don't really show that the link has 'rubbed off' on the later mark to give its owner an unfair advantage; (2) these are the factors that were used in relation to detriment to distinctive character, but the court has just said that these are two different types of harm; (3) the ECJ in Intel v CPM said such factors are… [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
” Watson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
This appears for example at paragraph 67 of the judgment of Sir Mark Potter P in Charman v Charman [2007] 1 FLR 1246 (Charman (No 4)) where he says:“… the starting point of every inquiry in an application of ancillary relief is the financial position of the parties. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:20 pm
At the time of the bench trial, Via Varejo had pending applications for three Casas Bahia service marks in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:29 pm
The oral argument transcript in Maples v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:38 pm
Here is the abstract: New York Times v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:03 am
" New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
The case is Osprey Ship Mgmt. v. [read post]
