Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 4,040
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Hart v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:44 am
Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 6:20 am
If you or a loved one suffers injury in an accident while working in a warehouse here in Indiana or Illinois, then be aware that there may be legal claims for damages under our state laws. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am
Building and Construction Trades Council of Metropolitan District v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am
Building and Construction Trades Council of Metropolitan District v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:19 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) unveiled the Clean Power Plan last summer, they did so with the goal of motivating states to limit carbon pollution from power plants—a goal that now may be facing limits of its own. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 7:58 am
Second Department: In Merget v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:48 am
Naruto v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:21 am
On May 26, 2020, a California Court of Appeals (4th District) issued its decision in Mosley et al. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
In Ryan v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
"Second, in determining that spent fuel can safely be stored on site at nuclear plants for sixty years after the expiration of a plant's license, the Commission failed to properly examine future dangers and key consequences. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
"Second, in determining that spent fuel can safely be stored on site at nuclear plants for sixty years after the expiration of a plant's license, the Commission failed to properly examine future dangers and key consequences. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:15 am
Distinguishing between an individual’s “domicile” and his or her “residence” for the purpose of meeting a “residence requirement” for employmentMatter of Ball v City of Syracuse, 2010 NY Slip Op 01037, decided on February 11, 2010, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Syracuse City Charter provides that employees "shall be at the time of their appointment and continue to be during their continuance in the employment of the city, residents of… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:54 am
Seed Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:15 am
Case examples include an employee who used customer credit card information to go on elaborate spending sprees (United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
Contracts * Kidstar v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
Specifically, the Court stated the displacement test as simply “whether the statute speaks directly to the question at issue,” and that in this case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
