Search for: "State v. Selle" Results 1481 - 1500 of 14,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 12:33 pm
Also, abandoning the house for personal use and then trying to sell it shortly thereafter (and claiming it is now held primarily for investment) is likely not sufficient under 1031 (although holding the property for a while after abandoning it for personal use may work...see Moore v CIR (2007)). [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:20 pm
Updating this Dec. 27, 2006 ILB entry, headed "Lilly wins major Zyprexa patent case," (and including a link to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 23-page opinion in the case of Eli Lilly v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:14 am by Eric Goldman
Moreover, the enumerated terms are all items that JLM might conceivably sell to the public and appear to be presumptively copyrightable. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Stevan Porter
The denial of the injunction will allow Samsung to continue to sell phones found to infringe Apple's patents. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Brenikov (AU)
The post It’s NUT yours, it’s mine: Kraft Foods v Bega Cheese and the importance of intellectual property due diligence appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Brenikov (AU)
The post It’s NUT yours, it’s mine: Kraft Foods v Bega Cheese and the importance of intellectual property due diligence appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]