Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 5,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 12:10 pm
The Court issued the 5-4 decision in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:46 am
" Christopher v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:26 am
Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the court in the Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:36 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, argued in dissent that the majority’s state-law easement analogies are inapposite. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 12:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 12:17 pm
v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:45 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court decided a fun case with a funny title: United States Forest Service v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:23 am
Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm
A third notable cert denial came in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am
Click-To-Call Technologies Sotomayor and Gorsuch dissented together, and in Ramos v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:58 am
The case is Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:58 am
The case is Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:44 am
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:02 am
Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in United States Forest Service v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
BOSTOCK v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The PROMESA Board Members Are Not "Officers of the United States." So What Are They?
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am
Justice Sotomayor's Concurring Opinion Justice Sotomayor "reluctantly concur[red] in judgment. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 3:45 am
Yesterday the court released a unanimous opinion in Lomax v. [read post]
