Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 11:08 am
" The residency requirement remains in some states as an element of a higher degree of the crime.In Taylor v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 409, 120 S. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:57 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Levinnstim v Parker, 27 AD3d 698; see also Molina v State of New York, 46 AD3d 642; Williams v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 10 AD3d 653). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
** See Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:23 pm
No facts make short opinions.United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:48 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit 2014); United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:51 pm
; Taylor v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 1:36 pm
Earlier this month, the 11th District Court of Appeals (Eastland) applied the “Tulia Law” in Taylor v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
First, an infringement suit ended in an award of $5.8 million in damages for infringement of egg pasteurization techniques in the case of Michael Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:38 am
Taylor KINGS COUNTYFamily Law Parties' Economic Partnership Ended 30 Years Ago; Distributive Award or Maintenance Is Inequitable C.U. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:10 am
Wright/WLF, earlier] Dear SCOTUS: certification of a class action should be based on admissible evidence [Andrew Grossman, Ilya Shapiro, and Meggan DeWitt on Cato cert amicus brief in Taylor Farms v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Here’s How They Get Around It” by Aaron Leibowitz (Miami Herald) for MSN Elections National: “‘THE Central Issue’: How the fall of Roe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 11:00 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
The 4th Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 10:41 am
Taylor addressed the law on this point. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 7:19 am
Ternus, former Chief Justice, Iowa Supreme Court, ousted after the court's decision in Varnum v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 2:09 pm
” Tynan at 400 (quoting Taylor v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
