Search for: "Stevens v. Thomas"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
Before THOMAS and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ FN*, District Judge. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
Up until Ice, so had Ginsberg and Stevens. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:58 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
" The phrase "original public meaning" seems to have entered into the contemporary theoretical debates in the work of Gary Lawson with Steven Calabresi as another "early adopter. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:19 pm
Yet the case--which produced a non-ideological split (Thomas for the majority, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, and Breyer, versus Scalia dissenting, joined by Souter and Ginsburg)--was only indirectly connected to net neutrality. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
See Harper v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 7:00 pm
Coming a close second would be Ford's appointment of Stevens. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:01 am
No, explains Judge Thomas in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Ricci v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:14 am
The case, Gross v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:36 am
Justice Kennedy was the only justice to author not a single 9-0 opinion (Roberts 1, Stevens 1, Scalia 2, Souter 4, Thomas 4, Ginsburg 5, Breyer 6, Alito 5). [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:55 am
Supreme Court, we know (or think we do) that on every controversial decision, civil or criminal, the vote will split 4-4 with Stevens, Souter (I'm being retroactive here), Ginsburg, and Breyer on one side; Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito on the other. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:52 am
The key case in this area is New Jersey v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
Justice Thomas wrote a decision, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy and Alito, concurring in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
A similar story can be told about Loving v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:04 pm
FEC and Austin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:51 am
Along with Justices Scalia and Souter, the majority in Melendez-Diaz included Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, John Paul Stevens and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
Richmond v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:13 am
Ricci v. [read post]
