Search for: "Stone v. State" Results 1481 - 1500 of 2,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 11:05 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
What the court really means is this: Tennessee has a dumb law that made sense back in the stone ages, but is unreasonable now. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:40 am
In particular, he took notice of footnote number 2, which states as follow: "Rosetta Stone conducted a brand equity study in February 2009 showing a substantial gap in actual recognition of the Rosetta Stone mark and the closest competing brand. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Celebrities in ads: federal and state infringement, federal and state dilution, false endorsement, defamation, and right of publicity are all possibilities. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:22 am by Matthew Shultz
The Fourth Circuit (Traxler, C.J.) has issued a unanimous decision in Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm by Geri Haight
” In reversing the award of summary judgment to Google on this issue, the Court stated that the district court “turned the summary judgment standard on its head. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:33 am by Travis Crabtree
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals may have provided trademark owners a little hope in its decision in Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:33 am by Travis Crabtree
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals may have provided trademark owners a little hope in its decision in Rosetta Stone v. [read post]