Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 16,386
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Although the project is being conducted in a purely experimental fashion using simulated data, the pilot can be seen as one of the first steps taken by a governmental agency towards creating a central bank digital currency.SEC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:07 am
That's why I absolutely agree with the key lesson from NCAA v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 7:28 am
The part of DOMA denying federal recognition to same-sex marriages that were valid in the state the couple lived in was struck down as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
Those benefits would be different with different types of reform, but they might be profound, potentially including the reversal of Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:57 pm
Every state is required to issue marriage licenses to interracial couples according to Loving v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
" New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
Hoi Kong Professor Jeremy Waldron is perhaps the world’s most influential critic of what he calls “strong judicial review of legislation” (SJRL). [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:45 am
In the other three states, it stems from strong home rule traditions and constitutional grants of local taxing power. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 10:57 am
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
As the nation’s most prominent professional medical association, the AMA’s unified stance brings a stronger physician-led voice in reproductive health care advocacy in the aftermath of Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 1:05 am
Ironically, the Campbell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 5:18 pm
Uniloc v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 2:43 pm
In the case of Bryant v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 11:11 am
V. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
But to the stated end? [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 9:39 am
” United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
From Gruber v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
That is evident in this observation: “The CAVV takes the view that not recognising functional immunity for international crimes is currently justifiable as either being consistent with international law or contributing to a legal development that already has strong momentum. [read post]
