Search for: "Sullivan v. Sullivan"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 3,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2020, 6:53 am
The Court says that while inmates must exhaust this administrative remedy, they do not have to wait for the jailers to take their sweet time in resolving the grievances before they can file suit.The case is Hayes v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 8:02 am
The Court of Appeals rejects both appeals, and the verdict stands.The case is Li v. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 10:17 am
But this case runs into a huge problem.The case is Yerdon v. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 6:03 am
The Conscious Uncoupling of UK and EU Intellectual Property Law," will be hosted in-person at UCL and live streamed.The speakers include Dr Ruth Fox (Director of the Hansard Society), Professor Phillip Johnson (University of Cardiff) and Nina O’Sullivan (Mishcon de Reya LLP). [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 8:03 am
This case would be included in any textbook on appellate practice, as it raises a rare issue that only an appellate maven would love.The case is Bey v. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 10:21 am
" The plaintiffs are conservative lawyers who speak out on political and religious issues "on forceful terms" and fear that the Connecticut disciplinary rules might be broad enough to result in their discipline.The case is Cerame v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
This means the plaintiff did not engage in protected speech under the First Amendment, and he cannot redress what he calls his retaliatory termination.The case is Shara v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 7:31 am
Siegelberg, Statelessness: A Modern History Jan Klabbers, reviewing Jens Steffek, International Organization as Technocratic Utopia Alexandra Hofer, reviewing Gavin Sullivan, The Law of the List: UN Counterterrorism Sanctions and the Politics of Global Security Law Paolo Palchetti, reviewing Hadi Azari, La demande reconventionnelle devant la Cour internationale de Justice Ingo Venzke, reviewing Sigrid Boysen, Die postkoloniale Konstellation: Natürliche Ressourcen und das… [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:25 am
This case holds that a factfinder may may determine that a restaurant at the Resorts World Casino had to notify employees that it was shutting down because it was sufficiently distinct from the Casino and therefore fell within the WARN Act.The case is Roberts v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 12:42 pm
Sullivan. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 6:56 am
The Court of Appeals reverses.The case is Nastri v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:22 am
The Court of Appeals (Leval and Chin, with Sullivan in dissent) reminds us that the First Amendment protects the right of access to complaints filed in court. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 5:44 am
The claims fail under a limited Supreme Court doctrine created in 1971 to allow plaintiffs to sue federal officials under the Constitution.The case is Crespo v. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 4:00 am
(forthcoming 2025).From SmartCILP:Nicole V. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:47 am
Sullivan, 418 F.3d 561, 569 (6th Cir. 2005) (citing United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
The following very informative piece was written by North Carolina family law attorney Mark Sullivan and appeared on the Solosez listserv. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Maples v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, FINRA No. 17-01489; DellaRusso and Sullivan v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:52 am
Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Sweeny, ... [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:04 am
United States v. [read post]
