Search for: "US v. London" Results 1481 - 1500 of 3,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
 The organisers had to resort to desperatemeasures in order to deliver the drinkson time for the Rapid Response event ...The London office of law firm Bird & Bird has kindly agreed to host this event (15 Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1JP), and there will be drinks afterwards. [read post]
26 May 2025, 2:10 pm by Ilya Somin
" Unfortunately, US Supreme Court precedents, such as the notorious ruling in, Kelo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:30 am by David G. Badertscher
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKAdmiralty Ship Owner Denied Attachment In Aid of Arbitration in London Swift Splash Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
 Stefano Barazza talks us through Medtronic v Mirowski in this PatLit post. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
 This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by centerforartlaw
Gall’s cultural identity and offered to loan the manuscripts to the Abbey Library.[8] The parties were able to analyze the issues at hand, and split interests into “title” and “use” of the objects. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:11 am
The broker proceeded on the basis that the clause scratched by Markel was a term of the reinsurance contract and submitted it to the London Policy Signing Office who included it in the reinsurance contract that they processed. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:36 pm by Chris Rufo | New England Law, US
Using her position, Vullo told Lloyd’s of London, who was facing violations of New York law, that she “would ‘focus’ her enforcement actions ‘solely’ on the syndicates with ties to the NRA,’ and ignore other syndicates writing similar policies. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:05 pm
The Times (UK) asks today, "Slaughter & May v Clifford Chance:  Who is pursuing the best route? [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Matthew Flinn
Thus on 1 April, two large demonstrations took place in the City of London. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
”What, indeed, can European design law and practice tell us about “the line”? [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
ZC v Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2040 (QB) is a peculiar case on its facts and the judgment is well worth a read. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:18 pm
Delicata v Sandberg, Central London County Court. 2 June 2009. [read post]