Search for: "US v. Stone"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 2,493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
” Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:15 am
– Paul Bernal https://t.co/HP1FHubcLY 2020-05-09 Sign-in wrap agreement enforced in Babcock v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
Nosal, No. 10-10038 (9th Cir.) - Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 1:12 pm
# # # Let’s let the SEC v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:59 am
Highlights this week included: Slammed by judge, ACS:Law not allowed to drop file-sharing cases: Media C.A.T. v Adams (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Copyright Blog) (The Bright Spark) (Techdirt) Competition trumps IP in footie decoder pub brawl: Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (IPKat) (1709 Blog) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Azrights) Please join the discussion by adding your comments… [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The latest is Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related dispute, this time involving a Community trade mark (CTM) application [it seems to this Kat that the word "polo" has the same effect on brand owners as catnip has on cats -- its appeal is irresistible]. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am
On (2), one had to conduct a multifactorial assessment based on all the circumstances of the case which included the relevant factors set out by David Stone in MEI Fields Designs Ltd v Saffron Cards and Gifts Ltd [2018] EWHC 132 (IPEC) as follows: (a) the terms of the contract of employment; (b) where the work was created; (c) whether the work was created during normal office hours; (d) who provided the materials for [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:49 pm
Stone & Downey, 75 N.J. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:22 am
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation [1] Hale v Innova The post Setting The Period of Reasonable Notice – Black Magic? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:31 pm
The man was given only a club, while “his fair opponent has the free use of her limbs and was furnished with a stone as large as the fist, or weighting from one to five pounds, fastened in a piece of stuff. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 8:55 am
v=BrYfPfgtgJ8&feature=youtube_gdata_playerI am not going to opine about the reliability of the confession here. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:29 am
This was apparently derived from Griffin v Isaacs. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:22 am
Contact us online or by phone at 519-821-5465 to schedule a consultation [1] Hale v Innova The post Setting The Period of Reasonable Notice – Black Magic? [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:02 am
The term “quality jewelry” meant jewelry using real gold, silver, other precious metals, diamonds, and other precious stones. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:41 am
Smith In the six years since the landmark Kelo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:59 pm
Stone Lion Capital Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:14 am
Truly, it’s a sticks-and-stones-can-hurt-me kind of world and even the n-word (which you would think EVERYONE knows is offensive) won’t support a HWE claim if it is used only once or twice, depending on the court (e.g., Denham v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, SDAla, March 26, 2013). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
Last year, the 9th Circuit decided in UMG v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
However, many legal commentators have stated that Gawker had nowhere to run following a 1985 US Supreme Court decision of Harper & Row Publishers v Nation Enterprises which held that The Nation's unauthorized publication of a 400 word excerpt from an over 600 page autobiography of former President Ford did not qualify as fair use. [read post]
