Search for: "United States v. Alter" Results 1481 - 1500 of 4,640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Waters of the United States, stolen gift cards, and Hester Prynne.] [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by Ryke Longest
The United States argues for the special master’s disgorgement remedy Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell argued on behalf of the United States in support of the special master’s Report. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm by Ken White
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 3:23 pm by Trevor Timm
Obama, undermines the government’s assertions that its bulk surveillance program, which collects virtually every phone record in the United States, is legal. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
("USEC"), which provided uranium enrichment services to the United States government, was renegotiating a contract with a Russian corporation. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
As part of its investigation, the United States served a search warrant on Carpathia. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:44 pm
For example, in the United States, those states that have adopted § 2-803 of the Uniform Probate Code would exempt persons who are not “criminally accountable for the felonious and intentional killing of the decedent”. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am by Kurt Lash
Privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States are not the same thing as privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 9:24 pm by Kurt Lash
  According to Bingham’s initial understanding, the Comity Clause of Article IV ought to be read as if it contained an “ellipsis,” thus protecting “the privileges and immunities [of citizens of the United States] in the several states. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:42 pm
Carlisle: The United States Supreme Court Says that Non-Signatories Can Enforce Arbitration Agreements Whenever State Law Would Permit them to Enforce Contracts Generally, Philip J. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:11 pm
”   While the state had contended that it has altered somewhat its lethal injection protocol, the Eleventh Circuit apparently did not consider that a reason to allow the execution to go forward. [read post]