Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 12,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2012, 10:27 am
The United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed a class action claim brought by a financial advisor employed by a major financial services company. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:04 pm
Related posts:Obscure Patents: KSR Does Not Mean MuchSo much has been made about the United States Supreme Court's decision in KSR v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:49 pm
Order here. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:40 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
As discussed here, on May 18, 2011, the California Intermediate Court of Appeal held in the Luther v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 7:13 am
California has a wide of industries that make the state a great place to live and work. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Oracle Corp., ___ Cal.4th ___ (Jun. 30, 2011), in which it addressed the UCL's extraterritorial reach: In this proceeding we address, at the request of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, questions about the applicability of California law to nonresident employees who work both here and in other states for a California-based employer. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:41 pm
Especially when the matter is relatively unimportant (at least in the scheme of things) and it's more critical to have a solid, articulated rule than it is for that rule to be precisely right.Right or wrong, until the United States Supreme Court speaks, or until Congress amends the statute, the rule in California is now clear. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 5:59 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:42 pm
The Court may well look to the California Supreme Court’s Brinker v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 3:39 pm
The Court may well look to the California Supreme Court’s Brinker v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am
AB 5 modifies how workers are classified as employees or independent contractors for state law purposes and codifies the 2018 California Supreme Court decision known as Dynamex. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:40 pm
United States Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:15 am
There are four criminal law decisions from the United States Supreme Court this morning:In McCoy v. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:09 pm
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
