Search for: "United States v. May"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 49,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am
” Under Exemption 3, the government notes that while legal advice may not constitute “intelligence sources and methods,” such advice may “incorporate[] information that would tend to reveal intelligence sources and methods. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 4:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Particular regard was given to the case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, where it was held that allowing an extradition of a party to the United States would constitute a violation of that person’s Article 3 rights, as he would be exposed to the risk of the application of the death penalty as a direct consequence of the extradition. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
We previously discussed AFCCA's holding in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 10:30 am
May 13, 2008) (Judge Ryan for a unanimous court), and United States v. [read post]
14 May 2008, 11:39 am
May 14, 2008).United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:42 am
United States (E.D. [read post]
5 May 2012, 12:17 pm
United States, which was authored by Justice Sotomayor, Setser seems to signal that there is much support on the Court right now for judicial sentencing discretion, which may have important implications for the future direction of “reasonableness review” of federal sentences. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
United States, which resulted in a 4-1-4 decision featuring multiple tests for determining whether a particular wetland could be considered as falling within the statutory category of “waters of the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
United States, which resulted in a 4-1-4 decision featuring multiple tests for determining whether a particular wetland could be considered as falling within the statutory category of “waters of the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:15 am
United States, which resulted in a 4-1-4 decision featuring multiple tests for determining whether a particular wetland could be considered as falling within the statutory category of “waters of the United States. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:49 am
It reads: "Any alien who applies or has applied for exemption or discharge from training or service in the Armed Forces . . . on the ground that he is an alien, and is or was relieved or discharged from such training or service on such ground, shall be permanently ineligible to become a citizen of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 3:40 pm
Today's CAAF grant in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:03 pm
Back at the beginning of May I wrote about an en banc, published opinion from the NMCCA in United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 7:28 am
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court decided in Citizens United v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:00 pm
In a recent United States Supreme Court case (Bullcoming v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:38 am
In other words, under more recent Supreme Court precedent, Garcia may no longer be good law.The intervening Supreme Court precedent on sovereign immunity and the ADA is United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:18 pm
May 5, 2010)Remember United States v. [read post]
