Search for: "V D"
Results 1481 - 1500
of 76,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2015, 11:54 am
Paul D. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:40 pm
Paul D. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:27 am
JOHNSON, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:02 am
St George v Home Office [2008] EWCA Civ 1068; [2008] WLR (D) 309 “When a person who was an addict suffered a seizure while he was in custody as a result of withdrawal from addiction, and then fell and suffered injury, regard was to be had, when considering the claimant's possible contributory negligence and whether the resulting damage was the result ‘partly of his own fault’, to the question whether the addiction was a ‘potent… [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:23 am
Expandable Ltd and others v Rubin [2008] EWCA Civ 59; [2008] WLR (D) 42 “The words ‘he wrote to me … drawing my attention to discrepancies’ in a witness statement were sufficient to amount to mention of a document for the purposes of CPR r 31.14(1), but such mere mention did not constitute an automatic waiver of the legal professional privilege attaching to the document, so as to entitle a party to… [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
Carver v BAA plc [2008] EWCA Civ 412; [2008] WLR (D) 122 “Where a claimant had obtained judgment as to liability, and an award in damages of a sum exceeding an earlier payment in, a judge was empowered by CPR r 36.14(1) to adopt a broad approach when considering costs and the question whether the result was ‘more advantageous’ vis à vis a refused payment in, and he was entitled if appropriate to award costs in favour of a … [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:30 pm
D. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
Following the appeal, Judge D. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 10:43 am
Case citation: D’Agostino v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:09 am
Craig D. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:58 am
Attorney General v Dallas [2012] WLR (D) 7 “In the context of alleged contempt of court by or affecting a juror or jury in the Crown Court, neither the Attorney General nor the alleged contemnor had any right to seek a trial by jury on indictment. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 2:28 am
Green v Eadie and others [2011] WLR (D) 335 “Sections 2 and 9(1) of the Limitation Act 1980 both applied to a claim brought under section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 and such a claim was therefore, by virtue of section 8(2) of the Limitation Act 1980, not within the ambit of section 8(1) of that Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:11 pm
(See Rothman v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm
(See, Ghory v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:14 am
(AMI) d/b/a ALSIDE, Defendant and Appellee. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:44 pm
CUSA PRTS, LLC, a corporation, d/b/a POWDER RIVER TRANSPORTATION, Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 10:03 am
KLEMENHAGEN, LLC, d/b/a STUMBLE INN, Defendant and Appellee. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 12:05 pm
In Dias v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 1:43 am
Mayr v Bäckerei und Konditorei Gerhard Flöckner OHG (Case C-506/06): WLR (D) 63 “An employee who was dismissed at a time between the in vitro fertilisation of her ova and the transfer of the fertilised ova to her uterus was not "pregnant" for the purposes of Directive 92/85 on the safety and health at work of pregnant workers, but her dismissal was unlawful under Directive 76/207 on equal treatment for men… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
(Wilson v. [read post]
