Search for: "Wal-Mart Inc. Stores" Results 1481 - 1500 of 1,969
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by Thomas Saunders
One can see some of the effects of these rules when looking at the director compensation table from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 1:44 pm
Consumer Product Safety Commission, in cooperation with Wal-Mart Stores Inc., today announced a voluntary recall of Flow Pro, Airtech, Aloha Breeze & Comfort Essentials Heaters. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:44 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. scored a second victory in its case against a former executive by convincing the Delaware Court of Chancery to extend the injunction preventing him from joining CVS Caremark Corporation. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:31 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
 The lawsuit, brought by several injured Wal-Mart employees, is known as Gianzero v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et. al., US DCT (D. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:46 am
Mass. 2005) (denying motion to compel inspection where “any benefit from the inspection ... is outweighed by the burdens that such inspection will impose”). 18 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 2:38 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed certification of a Rule 23(b)(2) class encompassing all women currently employed by Wal-Mart in a variety of different positions with claims for injunctive relief, declaratory relief and back pay but remanded as to certification of the claims for punitive damages and the claims of putative class members who no longer worked at… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:18 pm by Walsh & Walsh, P.C.
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in the landmark wage and hour class action case Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:55 pm by Lori Bauman
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., up to one million or more past and current female employees of Wal-Mart suffered discrimination in pay and promotions. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:30 am by Barry Barnett
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 603 F.3d 571 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). [read post]