Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 3,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 10:26 am
Arizona V. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
In the case, YANCHAK v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 4:49 pm
Courts have generally held that reading the Standard Statement is required to obtain a conviction for refusal, but Tirado, a 2010 decision by the Superior Court, Appellate Division, expanded this to a DWI case. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 8:31 am
Pattridge v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:27 pm
For Appellant, Office of the Attorney General: Steve Carter, Thomas M. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 10:59 am
Judge Jacobson ordered the IHR Clinic and the NJ Attorney General’s office to file a joint document by June 8, 2020 that lays out the resolution of the May 11th court filing. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 5:30 am
For Appointments Clause purposes, that makes his superior the attorney general. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 6:45 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:07 am
That case is Gordon v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
The plaintiffs filed a complaint in the state court as private attorney generals alleging violations by various American Express corporate defendants of the D.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 4:02 am
” In an op-ed at STAT, Michael Burg weighs in on the court’s recent opinion in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:57 am
A federal appellate court in Narayanan et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:16 am
Superior Court, 46 Cal. 4th 969 (2009) that PAGA claims need not satisfy class action requirements.The Court Disagreed. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:22 am
Olbermann has now filed his own wrongful termination complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleging that Current TV breached the contract first due to its incompetent production of his show. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 11:42 am
Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 294, 313, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 855, 926 P.2d 1042 [“civil statutes for the protection of the public are, generally, broadly construed in favor of that protective purpose”].) [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:11 am
The Court held in Wong v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:43 am
Bringing to mind the infamous Hatfield-McCoy family feud, Concho Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
