Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 191,936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2009, 2:34 am
” WLR Daily, 4th September 2009 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been [...] [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:22 am
Regina (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council and Another Supreme Court “Where land had been used for lawful sports and pastimes for at least 20 years and local inhabitants had not tried to prevent golf being played there did not preclude the inhabitants’ use of the land from being as of right so as to allow it to be registered as a town green. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:58 am
The ACLU v. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 2:27 am
Betterment Properties (Weymouth) Ltd v Dorset County Council Court of Appeal “On an application to the High Court to remove from the register land which had been registered as a town or village green, the parties could adduce whatever evidence they wished, subject to the court's exercise of its case management powers. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:01 am
ZN and Others (Afghanistan) v Entry Clearance Officer Supreme Court “Family members who applied to enter the United Kingdom to join a sponsor who had been granted asylum did not have to meet the maintenance and accommodation requirements imposed by the ordinary rules relating to applications by family members, even if the sponsor had, by then, obtained British citizenship. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:40 am
” WLR Daily, 2nd July 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
8 May 2007, 2:53 am
Separate loss-of-profit compensation for disturbance to land is too remote Welford and Others v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:18 am
Midlands Co-operative Society Ltd. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:06 am
Union Railways (North) Ltd and another v Kent County Council [2009] EWCA Civ 363; [2009] WLR (D) 143 “In a compulsory purchase order case in which applicable notices to treat had been served on the landowner, but not on a company which claimed previously to have acquired certain rights partly over land acquired under the order, [...] [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
No merits briefs have been filed yet. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:49 am
Regina (Bates) v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “A court order requiring the police to return items seized under a search warrant could not be enforced because no time had been set for compliance with the order. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:20 am
Axa Insurance Ltd v Akhter & Darby and Others Court of Appeal "An insurer’s cause of action for negligent advice by insured solicitors accrued when after-the-event insurance cover, creating contingent liability, had been issued to defendant solicitors to protect costs and expenses of litigants to bring actions and not when the litigants’ claims failed thereby causing financial [...] [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 6:14 am
The post WANDA LINN MURRAY, et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:10 pm
It is section 1983 black letter law after Monell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Yesterday, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) denied rehearing and amended its opinion in Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:02 am
Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 609; [2010] WLR (D) 144 “The single meaning rule in defamation did not apply in claims of malicious falsehood. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
As there has been much talk about the validity of the jury instructions in Capital Records v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:57 am
” WLR Daily, 10th March 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:23 am
Fecitt and others v NHS Manchester (Public Concern at Work intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 1190; [2011] WLR (D) 308 “A worker had been subjected to a detriment “on the ground that” he had made a protected disclosure, for the purposes of section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996, if the protected disclosure was a material factor in the employer’s decision to subject the employee to a detrimental act.” WLR Daily, 25th October 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
9-15-2009 North Carolina:Last week the North Carolina court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
