Search for: "Board of Education v. State Board of Education" Results 1501 - 1520 of 5,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am by Johanna Silver
South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP and AR NAACP v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
§2111 of the Education Law is an example of a situation where "acceptance of the resignation" is mandated by statute. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
§2111 of the Education Law is an example of a situation where "acceptance of the resignation" is mandated by statute. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Board of Education held that the establishment clause applies to state and local governments, all nine justices accepted this metaphor of a wall separating church and state as reflecting the commitment of the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:21 am
" Addressing the other aspects of Canna's appeal, the Appellate Division said that the disciplinary proceeding against Canna was not time-barred based on the 18-month limitations period set forth in Civil Service Law §75(4) because his "alleged incompetency was continuous" and that the penalty imposed upon him, dismissal, was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, citing Matter of Pell v Board of… [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 7:42 am by McLaughlin & Nardi, LLC
Detroit Board of Education,a prior United States Supreme Court case from 1977. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 12:30 am by ernst
Board of Education overturning Plessy v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
State Board of Education of Ohio, 490 F.2d 1285 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 932 (1974) (Fourteenth Amendment claim of local board against state). [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:30 am by Michael Madison
Five themes – targets — dominate continuing conversations about the state and future of legal education, and by extension about law and the legal profession as a whole. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:48 am
“(A) union is free to bargain away its members’ statutory rights when that bargain is expressly stated in the agreement,” a state Supreme Court Justice ruled in the Mancuso case. [read post]