Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 1501 - 1520 of 10,125
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Supreme Court used the opportunity to clarify the issues raised by this dispute in a unanimous decision by Justice Abella.[6] On the issue of whether a tariff issued by the Copyright Board is mandatory, the Supreme Court agreed that Section 68.2(1) of the Copyright Act only grants a collective society the right to collect defaulted payments from a user who has agreed to be bound by a licence on the approved terms. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 11:04 am by Ingrid Wuerth
The panel concluded that it was bound by prior decisions from the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
In this chapter, the ICO states that it may issue additional guidance on: optional supplementary clauses (to address risks identified in the transfer risk assessment); optional commercial clauses; a template for introducing changes to the IDTA; a multi-party IDTA; and an example of a completed transfer risk assessment and IDTA. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This was a real concern at the time because the CRA was adopted in 1996, before United States v. [read post]