Search for: "CF-3"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2008, 10:47 am
Cf. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:44 am
Cf. 26 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:34 pm
(Cf. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 1:53 pm
Cf. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:10 pm
Cf. 18 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
Cf. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 8:17 pm
(Cf: David Ball on Damages). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 3:33 am
" LNC Invs., Inc., 173 F.3d at 465; cf. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 5:24 am
Cf. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
And whether such arguments should really come via JR, rather than private law proceedings (‘tho cf the discussion in Arkin about this, back at the start of the pandemic). [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 3:58 am
Scenario No. 3: A shipment of quartz surface products (QSP) declared to be country of origin Malaysia becomes the subject of a CF 28 (i.e., a request for information) because CBP has reason to think the merchandise was not actually produced in Malaysia. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 6:08 am
Cf. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:14 am
Cf. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 12:57 am
Law & Tec 389 writing:Footnote 199: Cf. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm
Corp., 40 AD3d at 721; cf. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
[*3]To the extent that the plaintiffs’ allegations are insufficiently specific to each legal matter or particularized, the plaintiffs set forth a reasonable basis to believe that, with additional discovery, they would be able to develop sufficient facts to make more specific allegations (see Lemle v Lemle, 92 AD3d 494, 499-500 [2012]). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 5:17 am
Il résulte désormais des normes concernant la lutte contre le blanchiment d'argent que les intermédiaires financiers doivent, dans les limites fixées par la loi (cf. art. 3 à 10 LBA), collaborer avec les autorités compétentes. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
Cf., e.g., City of Norwood v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:37 pm
Cf. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
[*3]To the extent that the plaintiffs’ allegations are insufficiently specific to each legal matter or particularized, the plaintiffs set forth a reasonable basis to believe that, with additional discovery, they would be able to develop sufficient facts to make more specific allegations (see Lemle v Lemle, 92 AD3d 494, 499-500 [2012]). [read post]
