Search for: "COOPER v. LONG" Results 1501 - 1520 of 3,364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 1:28 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Helen Klein Murillo
Some former campaign staffers have been asked to cooperate with the request. [read post]
26 May 2017, 5:08 am by Edith Roberts
Reid Wilson reports for The Hill that Cooper v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
The court’s decision Monday in Cooper v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm by Anita Earls
State legislators cannot intentionally assign voters to districts on the basis of their race as long as they ultimately want a particular partisan result. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
” For anyone who seeks clarity in what states must do in redistricting to comply with the Voting Rights Act and the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, the Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 7:41 am by Michael Froomkin
Spotted via Tom Sullivan at digby’s blog, who links to a transcript at The Pulse and makes a link to the US Supreme Court’s recent 5-3 decision Cooper v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:26 am by Supreme People's Court Monitor
Some examples in recent months include:  excerpts from Supreme Court decision Padilla v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 8:45 am by EEM
""Comparing Cooperation on Migration Control: Italy–Libya and Australia–Indonesia," Irish Yearbook of International Law, vol. [read post]
9 May 2017, 10:56 am by Quinta Jurecic
Its long-term success remains unclear. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
Likewise, the Patent Cooperation Treaty has a state to state dispute settlement provision involving recourse at the International Court of Justice.So, Eli Lilly instead basically sought to have a NAFTA panel of three arbitrators overrule the SCC, which presumably saw no need to hear a case that challenged a long, evolutionary and clear line of Canadian case law. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am by Howard Knopf
Likewise, the Patent Cooperation Treaty has a state to state dispute settlement provision involving recourse at the International Court of Justice.So, Eli Lilly instead basically sought to have a NAFTA panel of three arbitrators overrule the SCC, which presumably saw no need to hear a case that challenged a long, evolutionary and clear line of Canadian case law. [read post]