Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 12,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 12:30 pm
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2020, 7:09 pm
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 11:08 am
More surprisingly, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari on April 16, 2012. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm
Lummi Nation (Fishing Treaty Rights) United States v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:59 am
Route 199 and State Route 197 in Del Norte County, California, near the Smith River. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:41 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:49 pm
United States (tribal trust funds, breach of fiduciary duties)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmState of Minnesota v. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 2:09 pm
Burwell (lease, Indian Health Service)United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:42 pm
June 12, 1942, an Information was filed in the District Court for Northern California charging a violation of the Act of March 21, 1942, in that petitioner had knowingly remained within the area covered by Exclusion Order No. 34. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
June 12, 1942, an Information was filed in the District Court for Northern California charging a violation of the Act of March 21, 1942, in that petitioner had knowingly remained within the area covered by Exclusion Order No. 34. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
June 12, 1942, an Information was filed in the District Court for Northern California charging a violation of the Act of March 21, 1942, in that petitioner had knowingly remained within the area covered by Exclusion Order No. 34. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 1:59 pm
Discussing this standard, the California Supreme Court, in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:13 pm
United States (9th Cir., Jan. 7, 2019, case no. 18-36082); -United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
Beard v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:59 am
Six Flags Theme Parks Inc., et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of California – May 9th, 2024) involves a claim under the Americans With Disabilities Act and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
[2] See Senators Wiener & Stern Respond to Governor Pausing Funding To Implement Landmark Climate Laws | Senator Scott Wiener (ca.gov) [3] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:55 pm
United States v. [read post]
Updated: Amicus briefs in support of the Proposition 8 respondents and DOMA respondent Edith Windsor
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Perry and respondent Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
