Search for: "Connors v. State" Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm by Nabiha Syed
  And at Cato@Liberty, Ilya Shapiro previews the issues in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by James Bickford
United States; both are scheduled for argument in February. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
Haw. 1978), two cases regarding judicial takings relied upon by the cert petition, Scalia and O'Connor's dissent from the denial of cert in Stevens v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
  Zehentner v Austria, a judgment of the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights, demonstrates yet again that the ECHR has a different approach to mandatory rights to possession than the House of Lords has expressed in the trilogy of cases (Buckley, Connors, McCann and Cosic against Qazi, Kay, Doherty). [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 12:31 pm
Any day now, the Justices will announce their decision in a case called Hein v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Thomas, though, has stated that view as a dissenter, most notably in the 2002 decision in Harris v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 10:21 am by Kent Scheidegger
Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote in the court's majority opinion that states can "outlaw cross burnings done with the intent to intimidate. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by James Bickford
A post at ACSblog suggests that Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 10:40 am by Jay Willis
Ann Warren at the Post Chronicle previews Snyder v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Mclarty Wolf
“[N]o two cases are identical,” the Court stated. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by Mclarty Wolf
“[N]o two cases are identical,” the Court stated. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 11:57 pm
That's the last time the state of Texas impeached a sitting judge, and according to Burnam, Rep. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"NYPD, said the court, "showed that the disclosure they ordered [Brown] to provide was appropriate in light of public safety considerations in view [of Brown's position as a] Supervisor Police Communication Technician, insuring that emergency 911 calls were immediately and accurately routed to the appropriate emergency responders, implicated public safety issues, giving the NYPD an interest in the records sufficient to outweigh [Brown's] privacy rights," citing… [read post]