Search for: "Control Components, Inc."
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
In subsection (a), Congress set forth the detailed “national standards” that were to control the fishery management plans to be promulgated under the statute. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, Albaugh Inc. of Ankeny will pay $27,360 for violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
March 16, 2020 Recent Articles of Interest An article by Joel R. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm
Control is part of your ability to make a living. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
New Life Art Inc., now on appeal, is an interesting case in this regard. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 11:59 am
Uber Promotions, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
If you believe you were wronged in the foreclosure process, and you fit in with the requirements, then I don’t think that you should wait for the OCC’s promised letter… take control, take action, start preparing your case NOW. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Gruender concluded that the district court had abused its discretion when it “ignored the statutory definition of ‘human being,’” which he stated is a “narrow, species-based definition” that does not include an ideological component, and that when the compelled disclosures are read in conjunction with that definition, they are not untruthful, misleading, or irrelevant. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
” On page 2, the Committee called the whistleblower protection a “crucial” component of SOX for “restoring trust in the financial markets by ensuring that corporate fraud and greed may be better detected, prevented and prosecuted. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:05 pm
Health plans and health insurers, health care providers, healthcare clearinghouses (Covered Entities) and their business associates should verify that their copying charges and other policies and practices for responding to requests of individuals for copies and other access to protected health information (PHI) comply with the Privacy and Security Rules (Privacy Rule) of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) as construed in a new Frequently Asked Question (FAQ… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:55 am
District Judge Kevin Castel of the Southern District Court of New York issued an injunction against Telegram Group Inc. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am
” It cites Basic Inc v Levinson (1988) for the proposition that “information is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider it important in making an investment decision or if the information would significantly alter the total mix of information made available. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
ABC, Inc., 898 F. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
Yahoo, Inc., 894 F.3d 116 (3d Cir. 2018), for example, the Third Circuit elected to return to its pre-2015 interpretation of the Act holding that a dialer cannot qualify as an ATDS unless it has the present ability to randomly or sequentially generate numbers and to dial them. [read post]
