Search for: "D J
v.
C R"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2020, 9:56 am
Here is the heart of the argument: Introduction Plaintiffs Sandra D. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:53 am
No Juizado Especial Federal, sua ação foi julgada improcedente, ao argumento de que, tratando-se no caso de cargo em comissão, não há estabilidade, podendo seu ocupante ser demitido a qualquer tempo e em qualquer circunstância, a critério do empregador, já que o vínculo mantido com a administração é sempre precário e sujeito à discricionariedade do empregador. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:52 am
(d) Byrd v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Smithers.[68] Dickson J. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of the Indian… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
West Hawaii Today reports on yesterday's oral arguments in the Supreme Court of Hawaii in County of Hawaii v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
§ 271(e)(4)(A), the effective date of any approval of the Panacea ANDA under § 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:03 am
(d/b/a Zydus Cadila). [read post]
25 May 2016, 1:39 pm
Maphalle, University of Cape Town (South Africa)· Judicial Protection of Women’s Matrimonial Property Rights in Nigeria, Anthony C. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
YouTube v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:58 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Charles R. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:17 am
(IP Osgoode) General – Copyright Copyright 2.0 show – Episode 186 includes Universal v Lenz update, Marvel comic win against Stan Lee (PlagiarismToday) Australia Australia confirms ISPs are not copyright cops: Roadshow Films v iiNet (Ars Technica) (ipwars) (Excess Copyright) (IP Whiteboard) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) Lander J upholds Registrar’s decision to allow DIGITEK: Hills Industries Limited v Bitek Pty Ltd (ipwars) (ipwars) Canada… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:52 am
D., at 191. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
R. 6201Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, and for other purposes.IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 11, 2020Mrs. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am
There is therefore a “disagreement which affects the result” within the meaning of R. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:33 am
Dávila Roldán [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:52 pm
For other posts in the series: Taxes From A To Z (2015): A Is For Actual Expense Method Taxes From A To Z (2015): B Is For Bona Fide Residence Test Taxes From A To Z (2015): C Is For Commuting Expenses Taxes From A To Z (2015): D Is For Disability Income Taxes From A To Z (2015): E Is For Early Distributions Taxes From A To Z (2015): F Is For FIFO Taxes From A To Z (2015): G Is For Gross Income Test Taxes From A To Z (2015): H Is For Household Employees Taxes From A To Z (2015): I… [read post]
