Search for: "DONALD v. THE STATE" Results 1501 - 1520 of 4,996
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm by Matt Cooper
Another state court case, also titled Donald J. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm by Sandy Levinson
  That's the reason that Rhode Island didn't even both to send any delegates to Philadelphia, because the state was foolish enough to believe that the text really mattered. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by SHG
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Donald Trump is not in denial, nor is he going through “a process” to make peace with losing the election. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
In the original 1964 photo, King flashed the “V for victory” sign after learning the US Senate had passed the civil rights bill. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
”We deeply hope that state legislatures will not follow Mark Levin and Donald Trump, Jr. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:54 pm by Amy Howe
Solicitor General Donald Verrilli – who successfully defended the ACA back in 2012 in NFIB – was less willing to acknowledge that the states might, in some circumstances, have a legal right to sue because of the paperwork burdens imposed by the mandate. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 1:14 pm by Unknown
Donald Trump (Sacred Sites) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlIn Re B.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:44 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — Misconduct in office Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Officer Donald Gaff, appellant, a patrol officer with the Baltimore City Police Department (“BPD”), was convicted of misconduct in office, but acquitted of second-degree assault. 1 His motion for a new trial was denied. ... [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Former Solicitor General Donald Verrilli (who defended the ACA in NFIB v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  As I've explained in this space countless times and elaborate in my amicus brief with Mike Dorf, the only reasonable reading of the 2017 Amendment--the reading that the President, every member of Congress, every media source, and the entire public have understood from December 2017 to the present day--is that the 2017 Congress and Donald Trump did not enact a "mandate" to maintain insurance; to the contrary, the whole point of that amendment was to eliminate… [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am by Brietta Clark
Texas, two individuals and 18 states are once again asking the Supreme Court to do what it refused to do eight years ago in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]