Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2009, 2:04 am
") monument in the park.The case came to the Supreme Court on this novel question: is a governmental entity's acceptance of a privately donated monument governmental speech, or private speech in a public forum? [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Div. 1957), Innes v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
"In contrast, said the court, such immunity does not extend to suits against municipal corporations or other governmental entities that are not an arm of the state.The court cited six factors determine whether an entity is an arm of the state:(1) how the entity is referred to in its documents of origin;(2) how the governing members of the entity are appointed;(3) how the entity is funded;(4) whether the entity's… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:23 am
See Abdullahi v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 5:45 am
Subject to Governmental Immunity: The Court considered whether the Irrigation District was a governmental entity to which immunity was granted by the WGCA. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
(map of Somalia to the right; credit)In Yousuf v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:29 pm
Does a Will avoid probate? [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:16 pm
Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989) and Adarand Constructors v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:46 pm
Required entities include governmental agencies, financial institutions, and some others. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:38 pm
The denial of private speech made in a public forum requires higher constitutional scrutiny than does speech made in a public forum by a governmental entity. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
As such, I imagine that this proposition does not present the same ground for challenge that California Prop 8 does. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 4:49 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post is based on a client memorandum by Adam Emmerich, Mark Gordon, Sabastian V. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
It's purpose is to protect the public from abusive governmental demands for information. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:34 pm
It's purpose is to protect the public from abusive governmental demands for information. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine does not. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:00 pm
Water Dist. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
"Mandamus" is one of a number of the ancient writs that were available under English common law to compel or prohibit actions by a governmental entity. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
"While an entity must be authorized pursuant to state law to be within the ambit of the Open Meetings Law . . . , not every entity whose power is derived from state law is deemed to be performing a governmental function. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:10 pm
" Carrozza v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:23 pm
" IMMIGRATION LAW Jin v. [read post]
