Search for: "Does 1-24"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 16,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2011, 5:40 am
Indonesian consumer law Article 8(1) does prohibit business actors to sell computerware without equipping it with Indonesian language manual. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 11:01 pm
Proc. 24(a)(1) allows intervention of right "when a statute of the United States confers an unconditional right to intervene. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:25 am
Effective 24 months after enactment (March 2012) Plans must provide participants with a four-page summary of benefits, in accordance with regulations that must be issued within 12 months of enactment (March 2011). [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:25 am
Effective 24 months after enactment (March 2012) Plans must provide participants with a four-page summary of benefits, in accordance with regulations that must be issued within 12 months of enactment (March 2011). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am
"Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 was identical to claim 1 of the main request except for the addition of the wording "wherein parent plants used in the cross are sexually incompatible" at the end of the claim.Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 read: [...]Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 read: [...]Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 read: [...]Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 read: [...]Claim 1 of the five claims of auxiliary… [read post]
ENTRY BAN UPDATE: Clarifications to June 22 Proclamation Bring Even Worse News, Except for Canadians
1 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
When the proclamation was initially released, it was unclear whether someone who had a valid visa on June 24, 2020, in any category (e.g., F-1, B-1/B-2, O-1, etc.) could later apply for an H, L or J visa and enter the United States. [read post]
ENTRY BAN UPDATE: Clarifications to June 22 Proclamation Bring Even Worse News, Except for Canadians
1 Jul 2020, 9:31 am
When the proclamation was initially released, it was unclear whether someone who had a valid visa on June 24, 2020, in any category (e.g., F-1, B-1/B-2, O-1, etc.) could later apply for an H, L or J visa and enter the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 2:06 am
Article 24(1) Brussels Ibis only applies if the action is based on a right in rem. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:52 pm
§§ 1, 2. [...] [read post]
14 May 2008, 7:53 pm
Does the Mafia exist? [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 6:43 am
Case Number: 1:21-cv-02519-TWP-MJDFile Date: Friday, September 24, 2021Plaintiff: Andrew “Andy” ThomasPlaintiff Counsel: Sean J. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am
The main issue in this correction was the addition of "or less" after "0,25 microns" in claim 1. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
Les parties ont ensuite, par les lettres du 24 mai 2018 et du 19 juin 2018, donné leur accord sur la prise d'une décision en procédure écrite.Motifs de la décision1. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 6:12 pm
Residual disinfectant products must be effective within 10 minutes of a virus or bacteria contacting a treated surface and must remain effective for up to 24 hours. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:05 pm
Applying the same logic than in In re J-H-S-, 24 I&N Dec. 196 (BIA 2007), women would have to 1) prove that there is a “family planning policy” prohibiting all pregnancy interruptions, 2) prove that they in fact violated said “policy” by terminating a pregnancy (voluntarily or involuntarily), via medical records, for example and 3) prove that such violation would be punished in a way that would give rise to objective fear (to the levels of persecution… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
Pursuant to the decision immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals are required to: (1) look first to the statute of conviction under the categorical inquiry; (2) if the categorical inquiry does not resolve the question, look to the alien’s record of conviction; and (3) if the record of conviction does not resolve the inquiry, consider any additional evidence the adjudicator determines is necessary or appropriate to resolve accurately the… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
”While we are immeasurably glad there is a Google in the world, the phrase “just like Google” does not strike any joy into the heart of a law librarian, though it may strike joy into the heart of a lawyer who does do serious legal research. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:04 pm
Presumably because (c) does not allow for suspension, while (d) does. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
Wyles, [1938] 1 Ch. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
This does not mean I am not able to execute the occasional will or send the odd demand letter – it does mean I am not forced to take whatever comes in the door. [read post]
