Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 1501 - 1520 of 9,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2009, 5:55 pm
If the Paulsons have $35 million to hand him, he's not going anywhere. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 11:20 am
The improvement limitation of claim 1 is thus in means-plus-function format, as permitted by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:44 pm
 In Pennsylvania, the Uniform Construction Code does not apply to:  (8) Alterations to residential buildings which do not make structural changes or changes to means of egress, except as required by ordinances in effect under sections 303(b)(1) or 503 of the act (35 P. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 5:03 am
First, according to the PTO, the claimed method does not qualify as a statutory "process. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:15 pm by Unknown
"Does the Right to Dignity Extend Equally to Refugees in South Africa? [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:01 am by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
On 23 April 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its ruling in Gömböc, C-237/19, ECLI:EU:C:2020:296, concerning the interpretation of Article 3(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) of the previous Trade Mark Directive 2008/95 (now Article 4(1)(e)(ii) and (iii) of Directive 2015/2436). [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:35 am
… At the same time, because Innova's OSA device also is not subject to a required FDCA approval process, it does not need the safe harbor protection afforded by 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:15 pm by emagraken
 This application was estimated to be heard in 35 minutes but took one hour. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:46 pm
By means of the second question, the referring court basically asks whether it amounts to an infringement of Art. 22 (1) - and thus justifies a refusal of recognition according to Art. 35 (1) Brussels I - if a judgment is given by a court of a Member State concerning land situated in an area of that State over which the government of this State does not exercise effective control. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:03 pm
09/310,880 (Harari) traced its priority date linage back to June 8, 1988. 5,828,601 (Hollmer) was filed December 1, 1993, with no antecedent. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 9:59 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This means that even an arbitration agreement contained in an unstamped instrument cannot be acted upon.Section 35 is different from Section 49 of the Registration Act as the former does not contain a proviso similar to the latter. [read post]
The Model does not require that manufacturers limit the list prices for their insulin products or that plans pass-through manufacturer rebates to the point of sale – more-significant changes that some have advocated. [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:25 am by Charles Bieneman
  Before the re-examination, independent claim 1 and dependent claim 2 had been held invalid based on the on-sale bar of 35 U.S.C. [read post]