Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 1501 - 1520 of 3,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2017, 12:29 am by Mathias Goh
Last month, 54 employees of a Singapore Government-linked company, Surbana Jurong, were terminated from employment. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm by Bill Marler
These vaccines provide long-term protection against HAV infection.[6] Hepatitis A is the only common vaccine-preventable foodborne disease in the United States.[7] This virus is one of five human hepatitis viruses that primarily infect the human liver and cause human illness.[8] Unlike hepatitis B and C, hepatitis A does not develop into chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which are both potentially fatal conditions.[9] Nonetheless, infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV) can lead to acute… [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm by Bill Marler
Information available at this time does not indicate an ongoing risk of hepatitis A virus infection at Tropical Smoothie Cafes. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 2:17 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The examining division raised further objections under Articles 123(2), 84, 54(1),(3) EPC, and, after being requeste to do so, took as decision according to the state of the file - to refuse. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Equity as a way of approaching legal issues has also become central to the way in which courts approach disputes.[1] Common law, then, does not define the entire universe of “judge administered” law in the United States.[2] This chapter, provides a brief introduction to the other great manifestation of judge administered law—equity. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:12 am by Jelle Hoekstra
Claim 6 of the main request:novelty (Article 54(1) EPC 1973)3.1 Document D1 discloses ...In view of the above the board finds that the apparatus of claim 6 of the main request is not new within the meaning of Article 54(1) EPC 1973.4. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:40 am by Ben
 More specifically, "the fact that the operator of a website makes it possible, by indexing them and providing a search engine, to find files containing works protected by copyright which are offered for sharing on a peer-to-peer network, constitutes a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of [the InfoSoc Directive], if that operator is aware of the fact that a work is made available on the network without the consent of the copyright holders and… [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:10 am
 More specifically, "the fact that the operator of a website makes it possible, by indexing them and providing a search engine, to find files containing works protected by copyright which are offered for sharing on a peer-to-peer network, constitutes a communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of [the InfoSoc Directive], if that operator is aware of the fact that a work is made available on the network without the consent of the copyright holders and… [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee[1] illustrates an important lesson for the patent bar: federal courts are far more familiar with administrative law than with patent law. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 3:57 am by Roel van Woudenberg
— Consequently, the subject—matter of claim 1 as granted lacked novelty under Article 54(3) EPC in view of the use of the cold flow improver of Example 1, disclosed identically in the parent application and in the priority document. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 2:14 am
No more from divsionalsOn 29 November 2016, the Enlarged Board of Appeal at the EPO had issued its order in case G 1/15, but not yet its decision. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm by Barry Sookman
The relevant connecting factors include (1) the location of the target audience of the website, (2) the source of the content on the website, (3) the location of the website operator, and (4) the location of the host server: SOCAN, above, at paras 59 and 61; see also Lawson, above, at para 41; Davydiuk v Internet Archive Canada, 2014 FC 944 (CanLII), [2014] FCJ No 1066 at paras 31-32 [Davydiuk]; Desjean v Intermix Media, Inc, 2006 FC 1395 (CanLII), [2006] FC 1395, [2007] 4 FCR 151 at para… [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Paragraph 1 shall not apply when the recipient of the service is acting under the authority or the control of the provider. [read post]