Search for: "Driver v. State"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 10,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2006, 5:27 am
(Potter v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:35 am
In the case of Birchfield v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
In Hayas v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:38 pm
As USA Today reported, prosecutors are having a difficult time getting convictions on cases of DUI involving prescription drugs because state laws have limited means to prove a person is impaired. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:49 am
[Beth Schwartzapfel, Marshall Project (“43 states suspend driver’s licenses for unpaid court debts, but only four require a hearing beforehand to determine whether the failure to pay is willful or simply a reflection of poverty. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
In Jones v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 1:28 pm
North Dakota on the issue of warrant requirements for tests of apparently intoxicated drivers. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 1:10 pm
In Hill v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm
Oakhurst Dairy, the United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit held that delivery drivers of a dairy company in Maine fell into an overtime exemption under the state’s employment laws. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:55 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:59 am
State, 2009 Md. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:37 am
Recognizing that Minnesota’s DWI test refusal law is more complicated that meets the eye, this week the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the conviction of a man convicted of refusing to submit to a DWI test in State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am
Checking for intoxication at roadside stops became legal after the 1975 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
Under State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 12:15 am
Vermont v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 12:15 am
Vermont v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:16 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:54 pm
In the recent appellate case of United Parcel Service, Inc. v. [read post]
